Problem this solves
- Manual cut decisions vary by operator and shift.
- Cut inconsistency can affect both quality and yield.
- Scaling production makes manual decision quality harder to maintain.
iStill NextGen Feature
Automates heads, hearts, and tails handling with temperature-based control.
How it works
Decision table
| Criterion | Conventional setup | iStill NextGen |
|---|---|---|
| Cut execution | Manual timing and sensory judgment every run. | Configured logic executes cuts automatically. |
| Scale-up readiness | Harder to keep decisions identical across operators. | Shared recipe settings support consistency across teams. |
| Training burden | Longer learning curve for reliable cuts. | New operators follow validated automated behavior. |
Compatibility
FAQ
Yes. Operators can intervene when needed, then update recipe settings for future runs.
No. It makes quality control more consistent by executing a validated strategy repeatedly.
Setup depends on recipe complexity, but teams usually validate over a short commissioning cycle.